Merge pull request #58 from QuickMythril/536140-fix

Block 536140 fix (same situation as block 535658)

src/main/java/org/qortal/block/Block.java

@@ -1100,6 +1100,10 @@ public class Block {
 				// Apply fix for block 535658 but fix will be rolled back before we exit method
 				Block535658.processFix(this);
 			}
+			else if (this.blockData.getHeight() == 536140) {
+				// Apply fix for block 536140 but fix will be rolled back before we exit method
+				Block536140.processFix(this);
+			}
 
 			for (Transaction transaction : this.getTransactions()) {
 				TransactionData transactionData = transaction.getTransactionData();

src/main/java/org/qortal/block/Block536140.java

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+package org.qortal.block;
+
+import org.qortal.naming.Name;
+import org.qortal.repository.DataException;
+
+public final class Block536140 {
+
+	private Block536140() {
+		/* Do not instantiate */
+	}
+
+	public static void processFix(Block block) throws DataException {
+		// Unregister the existing name record if it exists
+		// This ensures that the duplicate name is considered valid, and therefore
+		// the second (i.e. duplicate) REGISTER_NAME transaction data is applied.
+		// Both were issued by the same user account, so there is no conflict.
+		Name name = new Name(block.repository, "Qweb");
+		name.unregister();
+	}
+
+}